This article we will discuss the lawsuit that has been filed in 2012 against the MMR vaccine manufactured by Merck. In addition we will look at the controversy surrounding The Human Papillomavirus- HPV Vaccines/AS04 Adjuvant Gardasil (Merck) and Cervarix (GSK). We must be diligent as much as possible when researching this material on vaccines and must always remember that:
“Ff an unbiased researcher bases his or her work on biased research, the result could be an unintentional perpetuation of the bias.”
In August 2010 two former Merck virologists filed a ‘Qui Tam’ whistleblower lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co alleging that efficacy tests for the MMR vaccine were ‘fudged’. This lawsuit is dynamite, since it uncovers years of deception that the MMR vaccine that Merck manufactured was being unleashed to the world as a vaccine with 95% efficacy and everybody bought (brought) it. Since the mid 90’s Merck’s MMR vaccine was a lie, a deception..a dishonest travesty that potentially has put millions of lives at risk. Because of the repeated passage through eggs the Mumps part of the vaccine became diluted ( significantly from the days of Maurice Hilleman who invented the vaccine using the original virus from his 5 year old daughter) and in order for Merck to continue the FDA licensing Merck had to continually ‘prove’ the continual 95% efficacy.
To do this and to make the blood that contained the vaccine pass the test anti-bodies from rabbits were introduced which increased the efficacy to 100%. However, the test also involved examination of pre-vaccine blood and post-vaccine blood, and the introduction of the Rabbit anti-bodies made the pre-vaccine blood go from 10% to 80%, an obvious sign of foul play, but then another manipulation had to be completed. The value of 80% of the pre-vaccine blood had to be lowered, which was done by fabricating the ‘plaque count, thus providing a mathematical dilution of the blood count. It is alleged that the 2 whistleblowers were threatened internally with jail if they were to divulge the fraud to the FDA and “of course gentlemen, don’t forget the fat bonus cheques coming your way once the vaccines were certified. Merck continued this deception for over a decade or more to ensure its continued monopoly in selling this vaccine. As one attorney cites:
“Either Merck knows the current efficacy of its mumps vaccine, or it does not,” the attorney writes. “Whichever the case, Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy, which is accurately represented on the product’s label, but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is.”
In January 31 2016, the court ordered that discovery must be completed by March 1 2017 and expert discovery be completed by October 31 2017. Other motions must be filed by December 20 2017, and a motion for class action certification must be filed by March 1 2018 and Merck’s opposition to class certification by April 15 2018, so the legal process will take its normal long course and possibly sometime in 2018 there will be a judgement.
Andrew Wakefield and his ‘Tell’ on the MMR
If you have read the first article in this series on Vaccines, you will remember I wrote :
Merck approached the CDC with a Mumps vaccine, and the CDC conducted a study and confirmed there was no need for a mumps vaccine since the disease is benign in children, and this was the opinion in other parts of the world as well. Dr Wakefield claims that the mumps vaccine does not work in most cases and when it does the antibody production drops off very quickly (secondary failure) requiring another shot of vaccine, and as he says this vaccine became part of the vaccine program despite government agencies and regulators saying there was no need for it. The vaccine makers were aware of this problem but of course chose to run with it. Wakefield claims that the problem in using this vaccine potentially converts a benign disease in children to a more dangerous disease in adults (Testicular inflammation, sterility), and supposedly the drug makers were prepared to take this risk, but now the risk has turned into reality and mumps outbreaks are starting to become apparent within the adult population which could have been avoided had ‘they’ decided not to vaccinate for mumps and just allowed the body to naturally build its own immunity.
If indeed this is true it means that there was never a need to vaccinate against mumps and now we find out that it was done with an ineffective vaccine (in the US at least since Merck has the monopoly on selling the MMR Vaccine) is tantamount to criminal medical negligence. This also throws into question are there other questionable practices going on, and is there negative data being buried, what figures are being fudged??? The public will begin to question their credibility..no credibility without integrity. Why should we be surprised, this company has been hauled into court before.
The Human Papilloma Virus (HPV Vaccine/AS04 Adjuvant)
The adjuvant AS04 is a product from GSK that contains Aluminium Hydroxide and Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) which superseded the Squalene based adjuvant AS03. This adjuvant is currently licensed to be used in 2 vaccines Hepatitis B (HBV -Fendrix) and the Human Papillomavirus (HPV – Gardasil for both males and females and Cervarix for females only). Gardasil is used to prevent cervical/vaginal cancers occurring in females from ages 9-26, and to prevent anal cancer or genital warts for males aged between 9-26. The CDC recommends the administration of this vaccine for all boys and girls aged 11 and 12. Three vaccine doses are given the first between 9-26, the second 2 months after, and the third shot 4 months later.
Gardasil vs Cervarix
On November 2015 the European Medicines Agency released an assessment report (Review under article 20 of regulation (EC) No 726/2004) devised by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) on the current HPV Vaccines which are Gardasil/Silgard and Cervarix. As a result of routine surveillance of suspected adverse reaction reports questions have been raised on a possible association with these vaccines and 2 syndromes CRPS (Complex regional pain syndrome) and POTS (Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome). Reports of these associations have emanated from Australia,Germany,Japan, Denmark and the US. Since these conditions occur in unvaccinated people it is important to determine if the frequency of CRPS and/or POTS is higher in vaccinees than what has been reported in the absence of vaccines, and to determine any causal association of these 2 syndromes with the HPV vaccines. The current Global figures are 530,000 new cases/ann with 275,000 deaths/ann are attributed to HPV.
CRPS (Complex regional pain syndrome)
CRPS identifies itself with debilitating pain in one limb which can be caused by trauma fractures, sprains, surgery, injections, pregnancy, frostbite, burns, local infection, stroke and myocardial infarction, although in some cases it can spread to other limbs, but the predominant symptom is extreme pain. Cases typically occur within one month of the any of the above. In 74% of cases self resolve after 7 months of the symptoms (which can also include swelling,sweating and color changes in the painful area), but 16% still suffer after the median of 7 months. This condition statistically occurs in the background population of between 14.9 (10-19 years old)-28 (20-29 years old) 100,000 females and 1.8 (10-19 years old)-6.2 (20-29 years old)/100,000 males. Other symptoms could also include migraine-like headaches, chronic aches and pains, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, bloating, abdominal pain), sleep disturbance and shortness of breath.
POTS (Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome)
This condition causes a large increase in heart rate without any orthostatic hypotension (falling blood pressure in a standing position). Accompanied with an elevated heart rate may include palpitations, light headedness,weakness, brain fog, peripheral coldness and purple tinted skin, blurred vision and fainting in some cases. Estimates of approx 150 girls and young women/1 million may develop POTS/ann. A large number of individuals initially become symptomatic after a febrile (fever) illness such as mononucleosis or influenza. Approx 50% of patients will have partial or complete recovery within 2-5 years. Some POTS sufferers may be diagnosed with Chronic fatigue syndrome (encephalomyelitis) as an overlap condition. Bakken & colleagues suggested an estimated 30-70 adolescent girls/100,000 in UK are diagnosed/ann.
Cervarix is a Bi-valent (for HPV types 16,18) recombinant vaccine adjuvanted with AS04 and has been licensed in Europe since September 2007. Up to the date of this report (June 2015) 57,094,396 doses have been administered (equates to approx 19 million individuals that have received one dose). Post marketing surveillance specifically reporting POTS and CRPS since May 2007 is shown in the following table:
Table 1 Cervarix CRPS.POTS reports
|CRITERIA||CRPS/LOOKALIKE SYMPTOMS||POTS/LOOKALIKE SYMPTOMS|
|Met case definition||5||5|
|Partially met definition||37||13|
|Criteria not met||19||6|
Gardasil/Silgard, same vaccine different marketing licensing ( for HPV types 6,11,16 and 18) and contains the same AS04 adjuvant. Gardasil 9 contains 6 additional HPV types ( 31,33,45,52,58 ). Up to the date of this report (June 2015) 190,897,611 doses of qHPV vaccine have been distributed corresponding to more than 63 million individuals exposed (assuming 3 doses per individual). Post marketing surveillance specifically reporting POTS and CRPS since 2006 is shown in the following table:
Table 2 Gardasil/Silgard CRPS.POTS reports
|CRITERIA||CRPS/LOOKALIKE SYMPTOMS||POTS/LOOKALIKE SYMPTOMS|
|Met case definition||7||33|
|Partially met definition||22||13|
|Criteria not met||61||67|
Well, looking at the tables within the 8 years since the introduction of both vaccines there have only been (62 CRPS reports and 25 POTS reports for CERVARIX) and (90 CRPS reports and 113 POTS reports for GARDASIL/SILGARD) which is not even one drop in the bucket compared to 19 million vaccinees for CERVARIX and 63 million vaccinees for GARDASIL. So what is all the fuss about, and what was the final remarks from PRAC in terms of causal association of CRPS/POTS with the HPV Vaccines:
The Committee, having considered all the information available, concluded that the evidence does not support a causal association between HPV vaccination and CRPS and/or POTS. The PRAC confirmed that the benefit-risk balance of the HPV vaccines (Cervarix, Gardasil, Gardasil 9 and Silgard) remains favourable and recommends the maintenance of the marketing authorisations.
The Danish Health authority submitted the following table to PRAC for their consideration into the report, so in 61/2 years their ADR (Vaers equivalent) collected 1613 reports (363 were serious). If you now consider the whole of Europe during this time frame and numbers of reports will become substantial.
Table 3 Danish Adverse drug reaction reporting database for 6 I/2 years
|HPV Vaccine||2009||2010||2011||2012||2013||2014||Q1/Q2 2015||TOTAL|
|No of reports||288||66||43||96||511||224||385||1613|
This is what is on the CDC website:
Nearly 90 million doses of HPV vaccines were distributed in the United States from June 2006 through March 2016. Most of CDC’s HPV vaccine safety monitoring and research has focused on Gardasil because this vaccine has accounted for 87% of HPV vaccine doses distributed in the United States. From June 2006 through March 2016, about 79 million doses of Gardasil were distributed in the United States. During the same period, VAERS received 33,945 US reports of adverse events following Gardasil vaccination. There have been 232 US VAERS reports of adverse events following Cervarix (with 720,000 doses distributed) since licensure through March 31, 2016. VAERS has received 1,447 reports of adverse events following Gardasil 9 since licensure through March 31, 2016. About 10 million doses of Gardasil 9 have been distributed in the United States. Any medicine or vaccine can cause adverse events, and (as with any vaccine or medicine) it is difficult to determine whether or not the HPV vaccine caused a particular adverse event ( of course not..heaven forbid..the vaccine is innocent every time).
June 2006-March 2016 (10 years) there have been 33,945 Gardasil (70 million doses) adverse events and 232 Cervarix (720,000 doses) adverse events, and 1,447 Gardasil (10 million doses) 9 adverse events. That is a total of 35,624 adverse events reported for the HPV vaccine ( 80,720,000 doses ) in 10 years in the US ( Approx 3,562 reports/ann). The total reports for the whole of Europe are not available, although ECDC..no not ACDC..The European Centre for disease prevention and control informs us that a total of 19 out of 29 countries in the EU have implemented a routine HPV Vaccination program and 10 countries have introduced a catch-up program. As of May 2012 the vaccination advisory bodies in 22 of the 29 countries have recommended the HPV vaccination compared to 12 out of the 27 countries in Feb 2008.
Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Poland and Slovakia have not yet introduced a national immunisation programme, nor have their vaccination advisory boards produced recommendations for the introduction of HPV vaccination. In two countries, Bulgaria and Czech Republic, the recommendation has been produced but the HPV vaccination has actually been integrated into the national immunisation programme. In 19 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom) the programme is currently active, and ten of them have also introduced catch-up programmes for women.In 2010, out of seven countries for which data were available, only Portugal and the United Kingdom had vaccination coverage rates of ≥80%. As of 2010, thirteen countries (Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom) had declared that there was a national HPV vaccination coverage monitoring system in place for routine immunisation. Five of these countries (France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden) reported the existence of systems in place to follow up on adults/adolescents.
So for the moment we cannot even estimate what might be the reporting numbers. The other important issue is the developing countries where 80 % of the 274,000 HPV global deaths/ann occur. In 2013 The GAVI Alliance (the Vaccine Alliance headed by none other than the Gates family) will begin administering the HPV vaccine in 2013 to girls 9-13 in 8 of the 82 developing countries. GAVI estimates that by 2015 that will strive to help more than 20 countries and to vaccinate more than 30 million girls in over 40 countries by 2020.
The HPV Vaccines fair well during 4 large Phase III Studies
According to a publication in PubMed (NCBI) in 2015 having analyzed Gardasil containing VLP`s 6,11,16 and 18 (produced by Merck) and Cervarix (produced by GSK), both vaccines worked well as was reported:
The vaccines also demonstrated remarkably high and similar efficacy against the vaccine-targeted types for a range of cervical endpoints from persistent infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3
For practical reasons, efficacy studies have not been conducted in the primary target populations of current vaccination programs, adolescent girls and boys. However immunogenicity bridging studies demonstrating excellent safety and strong immune responses in adolescence, coupled with the documentation of durable antibody responses and protection in young adults, leads to an optimistic projection of the effectiveness of the vaccines in adolescent vaccination programs.
Four large Phase III studies were conducted, two for each vaccine using 5.500-18,500 vaccinees, and in terms of safety it was reported that both vaccines exhibited excellent safety profiles with mild to moderate injection site symptoms, headache and fatigue were the most common adverse events. There were no other serious adverse events reported.
Lipid A is a lipid (Fat) component of an endotoxin associated with the toxic substance of gram negative (generally resistant to anti-biotic assaults) pathogenic bacteria such as E.Coli. A modified version of Lipid A has been devised by vaccine makers (specifically GSK and one of its subsidiaries Corixa Corp) called Monophosphorylated (to alter the activity of a protein) Lipid A (MPL) containing a lipopolysaccharide ( the endotoxin from a bacterial strain Salmonella Minnesota R595).
Not Everyone is happy with the Gardasil Vaccine
So it appears that the Gardasil vaccine is safe and effective, so why did a researcher (Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD) from the University of British Columbia in her 2011 paper `Gardasil vaccination:evaluating the risks and benefits` write:
“The efficacy of Gardasil in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated and the marketing campaign has been misleading. The efficacy of Gardasil remains unsubstantiated since the vaccine hasn’t been adequately tested on the primary age group to which it is currently given.”
She also references other reports published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) and Nature Biotechnology who state:
“Most genital infections are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously, but the virus can persist and cause precancerous lesions that can become malignant over the subsequent 20-30 years.“ (Nature Biotechnology, 2007)
“So how should a parent, physician, politician, or anyone else decide whether it is a good thing to give young girls a vaccine that partly prevents infection caused by a sexually transmitted disease (HPV infection), an infection that in a few cases will cause cancer 20 to 40 years from now?” (JAMA, 2009 )…and:
….that Malignant cervical cancer takes decades to develop and yet the longest Gardasil trail was only 4 years which means that Gardasil was never shown to prevent cervical cancer.
She also points out that at the time, in 2011 the US the death rate for cervical cancer was 2.4/100,000 women compared to a higher rate of serious adverse events including death from Gardasil which is 3.34/100,000 distributed doses. What is more, cervical cancer is rare in developed countries, and incidence rates have dropped significantly due to regular pap smear screening ( within the past 4 decades 74%).
Diane Harper MD Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology who conducted the Phase 2 and 3 trials for Gardasil claims that:
“70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within two years, the number climbs to 90%. Of the remaining 10% of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical cancer.”
Charlotte Haug MD from a JAMA editorial stated that:
“The virus does not appear to be very harmful because almost all HPV infections are cleared by the immune system. In a few women, the HPV infection persists, and some women may develop precancerous cervical lesions and eventually cancer. It is currently impossible to predict in which women this will occur and why. Likewise, it is impossible to predict exactly what effect vaccination of young girls and women will have on the incidence of cervical cancer 20 to 40 years from now.”
Lucija Tomljenovic also states:
“Since 2006 when it was first approved, Gardasil has been associated with 20, 915 adverse reactions in the US alone. These included 89 deaths, over 1000 cases that required emergency hospitalization, and 382 abnormal pap tests 47-49. Could the vaccine exacerbate the very disease it is claimed to prevent?”
Now you can understand why Dr Suzanne Humphries is on this anti-Gardasil crusade.
and her experience with the HPV Vaccine (a Gardasil case study)-Photo from vaccineimpact.com
I suppose these statistics include Sydney Weggen 11 year old (at the time) from Iowa who received 2 vaccinations on the same day, the DtaP and the Gardasil vaccine (shot 1) in November 2011 and then received the other 2 shots 2 and 4 months later.(May 2012). Soon after the vaccination she developed a loss of appetite and lost 20 pounds before her 12th birthday. Her physician said it was a psychiatric problem (I wonder how he reached that conclusion.. BECAUSE HE COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG… AND FAILED TO DIG A LITTLE DEEPER), and her condition worsened until they discovered fluid in her right lung coupled with pneumonia and breathing problems. In the meantime she was referred to a specialist who ruled out Crohn’s and Lupus diseases..yeah..and what do you think is wrong…eh…I don’t know, I’m only a specialist, I`m not God (really..specialist in what hygiene..). Without a definite diagnosis of her condition from the local hospital, her parents took her to the Mayo clinic where they spent $20,000 on tests and the Mayo clinic finally diagnosed Histoplasmosis ( an infectious disease of the lung, thought to be caused by inhaling infectious fungal spores that grow on bird and bat droppings). In the meantime her local clinic (I suppose the specialist had a brainstorm and pulled out a label from a hat ) came up with another diagnosis `Mycoplasma pneumoniae` (A respiratory infectious disease caused by common bacteria, such as Streptococcus and Haemophilus).
The parents were in a quandary, which diagnosis is correct, so they chose (the parents) Histoplasmosis and their daughter took anti-fungal medicine for 3 months believing that their daughter’s condition would dissipate. It did not, so they contacted the Mayo clinic again and they suggested that this time she see a pulmonary specialist (why did they not do that during the initial visit) who did a CT scan and lung testing (this was December 2013), after which they met with 3 `specialists` who included an infectious disease expert, an oncologist, and a Pulmonologist and they all confirmed that there was a mass in her mediastinal area (middle of the chest between the sternum and spinal column) occluding her pulmonary artery resulting in only a 2% blood flow going to her right lung. The told sydney`s parents that we need to rule out lymphoma by doing a biopsy. That I assume was negative because they finally concluded that “this is a rare condition caused by the fungal infection“ (physicians are great with their hypothesis)…oh they continued..“her immune system is in such a hyper state that the lymph nodes associated with the lungs are turning into big granulating masses compromising her right lung“.
After all the prodding and poking, endoscopy, colonoscopy, biopsy they put a stent in her right pulmonary artery to increase blood flow (which only increased it by 11%) and she lives now with the malignant mass which was deemed to be inoperable and her and her worried parents live every day hoping that the mass does not increase in size. Within 10 months the stent collapsed (94% occlusion) so the stent procedure had to be redone and the little girl was in the hospital for another 6 days ( late 2014). The final diagnosis according to her father was `Postistinal plasmosis fibrosis medius minimus`. Suffice to say she was on a boatload of medication including blood thinners and immune-supressives. Didn’t anybody make at least one association toward the vaccine…oh no it cannot possibly be that..did anyone check the Post marketing experience from Merck`s website..it’s written there in plain sight, for all the world to see Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders:
Pulmonary embolus…..of course not. Having viewed the video from the website Vaccine impact I can tell you that this little girl is lucky to have such courageous, very bright, unbelievably patient parents to help her through this ordeal..I honor these people. Organized chaos and ineptitude in the first order..and you want to visit these people.
Post Marketing Experience of Gardasil
The glaring problem is that most clinical trials are diligent in their eligibility criteria concerning trial participants in that the trial organizers are instructed to only allow healthy people that preferably are not on any other medication which would obviously `muddy the waters` in terms of possible adverse effects and the final trial results, which an acceptable criteria. However, once the trials are over and the drug or vaccine is approved it is given to everybody, healthy and unhealthy, although the Merck package insert for Gardasil specifically states that Gardasil is proven to be safe when Gardasil and the DtaP vaccine are given at the same time as it were (on the same day). According to the website Sanevax.org the post marketing experience (this is a postmarketing surveillance practice that monitors the safety of a pharmaceutical substance or medical device after it has been released on the market and a critical input for pharmacovigilance database which should then be forwarded on to the drug regulator) for Gardasil reports the following adverse events. I have highlighted the 2nd sub category which resembles the condition that Sydney Weggen had to endure ( coincidence or casual..I will let you be the judge) :
Blood and lymphatic system disorders:
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia,
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura,
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders:
General disorders and administration site conditions:
Immune system disorders:
Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, Bronchospasm and urticaria
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders:
Nervous system disorders:
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, dizziness,
Motor neuron disease,
Syncope (including syncope associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity) sometimes resulting in falling with injury
Deep venous thrombosis.
The list above was taken from Merck’s own document which you can find on the following link:
and her experience with the HPV Vaccine (a Cervarix case study)
Valeria received her second dose of Cervarix May 29 2014 and a week later she began to lose strength in her right leg and then in her left leg which was painful for her to walk. Valeria and her mother visited their local physician who thought it was sciatica related and referred her to a `specialist` who put her on prednisone (I have discussed this poison in previous articles and it is a skeletal destroyer). The next day Valeria was completely paralyzed for almost 5 days. She was given more prednisone and then the “Fizzician` claimed she was psycho-somatic (Isn’t it ironic that once a physician gets stumped for a diagnosis they immediately say “It’s all in your head“….what did Voltaire say …Doctors are men, who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, for men, of whom they know nothing at all). The first symptom sounds like CRPS (…CRPS identifies itself with debilitating pain in one limb…). Valeria`s mother, in her desperate search for a cure ( this sounds like the 1780`s ) she went to a private doctor who periodically gave her human immunoglobulin ( this is plasma that contains anti-bodies..something we mentioned before as an alternative to the tetanus shot that you can apply to a deep wound to prevent infection), so I am not sure why this was administered..anyway it’s better that prednisone..a shot of whiskey is better than prednisone.
Her mother reports now she is undergoing physical therapy and has been for 6 months and she does not have an accurate diagnosis. Her homeostatic system has been knocked out because she has trouble regulating her body temperature, and she has heart palpitations, weakness and tremors. She lives in constant pain and due to her Tachycardia doctors monitor her with an Holter monitor (Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome…this condition causes a large increase in heart rate without any orthostatic hypotension..does this sound familiar ). In the meantime her mother says that she has new symptoms vision problems and dysautonomia (Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a form of dysautonomia that is estimated to impact between 1,000,000 and 3,000,000 Americans, and millions more around the world. POTS is a form of orthostatic intolerance that is associated with the presence of excessive tachycardia and many other symptoms upon standing..sound familiar again).
The girl is walking with a cane and physicians have prescribed Tylenol ( …Tylenol..really, one of the most destructive drugs available and that’s all they can find in their drug tin) to deal with her left hip and flaccid leg paralysis..All the symptoms point to damage done by the vaccine..
What do the vaccine manufacturers prescribe to treat a little person that has been damaged by their vaccine..they must have some idea because the physicians in this case do not have a clue..they are not even aware of Merck’s published adverse effects that have been reported from the post marketing surveillance program…meandering lumps of ignorance..and meanwhile this mother is frantic with worry while Valeria suffers needlessly…Bring that girl to the great man the modern hippocrates..Dr John…he will fix her without any poison.
What can I possibly say, Merck and GSK admit in their documentation that certain adverse events have been reported more than once so at least nothing is hidden, but local physicians and even their `Specialists` (that’s a laugh..my wife had trigeminal neuralgia a few years back and she went to see a neurologist ( specialist) who prescribed her with an anti-depressant..I can’t make this stuff up), are clueless on what to do..they all stand around trying to find inspiration and ideas for diagnosis when all of the time the answers are in the manufacturer’s documentation. HOW DID WE GET HERE.
You must have heard the old old story of the man looking for a $2 coin that he had dropped in the darkness and he`s looking for the coin under a street lamp and another man walks by and asks what he`s looking for and the other guy replies that he has lost a coin. The passerby offers to help him and after half an hour the passerby asks the guy “Are you sure you dropped the coin here“..to which the man replies “No I lost it around the corner, but there is light here“.
- Some notable adjuvants Patent lens
- A review of Clinical trials of Human Papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines Schiller,Castellsague, Garland 2015 NCBI
- Recent advances of vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease Lee, Nguyen 2015 NCBI
- HPV Vaccine World Association for vaccine education (WAVE)
- Lipid A Wikipedia
- Gardasil Vaccination : evaluating the risks vs benefits Lucija Tomijenovic University of British Columbia
- Dr Humphries examines data on Gardasil vaccine from Merck`s own package inserts Vaccine Impact
- Post Marketing experience Gardasil Sane Vax.org/Merck
- Assessment report HPV Vaccines European Medicines Nov 2015
- Introduction of HPV Vaccines in EU Countries – An update Sept 2012 European Centre for Disease prevention and control (ECDC)
- Introducing HPV Vaccine in developing countries – Key challenges and issues Jan Agoshi, Sue Goldie 2007 New England journal of Medicine
- 8 developing countries get HPV Vaccination programs Kasy Beduhn 2013 The Borgan Project/the blog
- Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) Dysautonomia International
Author: Eric Malouin